FRACKING FOIBLES
Fracking Foibles
Fracking is simply a
stimulation process whereby fluids are forced into an oil formation surrounding
a well bore. When this forced fluid gets to measured fractured inclination the
rock divides and the fluid continues its journey. Usually, pressurized water,
sand and some chemicals are pumped into shale rock formations to disengage and
released gagged natural gas. This process was first used in Hugoton, Kansas.
Since then it has had names like fracturing, fracking and, or hydraulic fracturing.
This drilling method has had
some environmental downsides. Environmentalist claim that fracking pollutes
rivers and waters, produces flammable water, exudes radiation and even change
quiet farmlands into boisterous industrial locations. Complaints of
breathing-related problems, nauseated feelings, cancer and headaches have been
noted by those living in communities where this drilling process takes place. These
pose a problem to the health of the population or community in which such oil
and gas drilling procedure occurs. Opposition to fracking seems to be on the
increase in developed countries rather than the under-developed nations. This
calls for awareness in the oil producing developing nations.
In Wyoming, the United States
Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) reported an incident of groundwater
contamination with chemicals and fracturing additives. These groundwater
contamination was discovered about 372 metres down where the locals fetch
water. In Texas, some of these groundwater contaminants are further pushed down
the soil thereby causing ripples underneath. In 2011, Texas has also passed a
chemical disclosure law with exception for trade secrets. Colorado has started
air emissions regulations from fracturing operations.
Given these succinct scenarios
in the US? What is the hope for developing countries where oil and gas
exploration has remained exploitation? What is the hope of oil producing
countries in third world countries where legislatures have no balls to pass
laws and regulations that will guide against putting the health of its people
in jeopardy? Is their a role for the World Health Organization (WHO) or even
Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) in ensuring that the
health of the communities are protected and ensured? Given the fact that over
90% of vertical and horizontal oil and gas wells in the US employ some form of
hydraulic fracturing, what is the hope of the population where fracturing
operations take place in ensuring that their waters are not contaminated and
air emitted are not polluted?
References
Berman, M.L. (2011). From health care reform to public
health reform. Journal of Law, Medicine
& Ethics, 328-339.
Edwards, J., John, S.J., & Travis, O. (2011). Government
studies may determine the future of fracking regulation. Energy Litigation Journal, 11 (1).
Linda, M. (2011). Fracking nation. Discover 32 (4).
Linda, M. (2012). Worries: Methane leaks, radioactive water.
Discover 33 (1).
Peter, A. (2012). Drilling into the unknown. New Scientist, 213 (2849).
White, K.H. (2011). The fracas about fracking. National Review, 38-41.
Comments
Post a Comment